Erica has shown that she's not happy. She believes that the entire situation could've been avoided and that this was all unnecessary. She repeats things many times, and uses forceful language. She continues to push her claims with or without proof, as well as assume the role of a witness in order to assure you she knows more than you.
The facts are there. They currently exist in the form of supposed eye-witness accounts of the events. Currently, as with all shootings, it is being investigated by an outside agency, as well as Internal Affairs. No statements are fact until brought about in court. The article exists online here and you can read it for yourself. Erica decides to ignore some facts and just present you with what she shows, as well as make her own inferences. She concludes that the entire event was unnecessary and uncalled for.
A repetition of words and repeated use of assuming words. Quizative statements as well as remarks about actions taken are used. Javi uses all of the available facts and uses little to no personal remarks. There's a clear difference between the front page and the "Op-Ed" section.
No comments:
Post a Comment